ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES@#To construct a quantitative index system with the integrated medical and nursing care assessment for the elderly service needs, this system can assess the cost of medical and care services accurately and objectively, so as to provide scientific basis for the allocation of old-age service resources in China.@*METHODS@#Based on the survival needs of the Existence, Relation and Growth theory, an index system is constructed through literature analysis, group discussion, and expert correspondence. Analytic hierarchy process was used to determine the weights of indicators at all levels. The 3-grades service items corresponding to each index were quantified through the measurement of working hours, and the medical and nursing care needs of 624 disabled/demented elderly people over 60 years old in Changsha were investigated to evaluate their reliability and validity.@*RESULTS@#The authoritative coefficients of the 2 rounds of expert correspondence were 88.5% and 88.6%, respectively, and the opinion coordination coefficients were 0.159 and 0.167, respectively. The final quantitative evaluation index system included 4 first-level indicators, 17 second-level indicators, and 105 third-level indicators. The service time of doctor ranged from 6.01 to 22.64 min, the service time of nurses ranged from 0.77 to 24.79 min, and the service time of caregiver ranged from 0.12 to 51.88 min. The Cronbach's αcoefficient was 0.73, the split-half reliability was 0.74, the content validity was 0.93, and the calibration validity was 0.781.@*CONCLUSIONS@#The quantitative evaluation index system of medical and nursing service need for the elderly can be used to accurately evaluate the medical and nursing service need.
Subject(s)
Humans , Aged , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires , Delphi Technique , Nursing Care , ChinaABSTRACT
Objective:To experimentally intervene safe injection by medical staff in basic-level hospitals and observe the recent and long-term effect atfer the intervention and to provide practical measures to improve safe injection. Methods:We used random sampling methods to set up groups in county hospitals and township hospitals of Hunan Province, and offered lectures, delivered safe injection guide, brochure and on-site guidance in the experimental group. We surveyed the 2 groups atfer the intervention at 1 month and 6 months to compare the effect of unsafe injection behaviors and safe injection behaviors. Results:One month after the intervention, the unsafe injection rate in the experimental group decreased from 27.8%to 21.7%, while in the control group injection the unsafe injection rate rose from 26.0%to 27.9%, with signiifcant difference (P<0.01). Six months atfer the intervention, the unsafe injection rate in the experimental group declined to 18.4%while the unsafe injection rate in the control group also dropped to 22.4%, with signiifcant difference (P<0.01). Unsafe injection rate was decreased in the experimental group at different intervention points, with signiifcant difference (P<0.01). The safe injection behavior scores in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group after the intervention of 1 month and 6 month intervention (P<0.01);the experimental group got higher scores atfer the intervention (P<0.01). Conclusion:Training of safe injection, distribution of safe injection guide, and comprehensive intervention model can significantly change the primary care practitioners’ behaviors in unsafe injections and it is worth promoting.